cod. 1005995

Academic year 2021/22
2° year of course - First semester
- Giulio IACOLI
Academic discipline
Critica letteraria e letterature comparate (L-FIL-LET/14)
Attività formative affini o integrative
Type of training activity
30 hours
of face-to-face activities
6 credits
hub: PARMA
course unit

Learning objectives

Knowledge and understanding.
The course aims at strengthening the basic knowledge of literary study, opening the way for a specialized field, and promoting the development of original statements about the thematic net described throughout the course itself.
Applying knowledge and understanding.
The study of literary methods, the learning of the genre theories, and finally the comparative approach elicit the development of the capacity to understand and connect literary facts, in a profoundly interdisciplinary perspective.
Making judgements.
By the end of the course students ought to have acquired the capacity to carefully value the complexity of literary text, critically interpreting their structural elements, the morphological similarities and differences between them. They should also have acquired particular intepretive and comparative abilities about the historical and socio-cultural contexts to which those artistic documents belong.
Communication skills.
By the end of the course students should have conceived the capacity to describe literary texts on the basis of the genre theories and supranational literary study, developing a personal, reliable and consistent way of reading.
Learning skills.
The commitment shown in acquiring competences and learning should provide the students with a definite methodological competence as well as with skills aimed at consolidating their set of readings, their capacity to understand and schematize the dynamics of literary facts – all necessary skills in order to organize contents into the written form.


- - -

Course unit content

Towards an anniversary: interpreting Dino Buzzati (1906-1972) by means of genres, topics, transmediality

The upcoming celebration of an anniversary – fifty years from Dino Buzzati’s death – may prove an ideal opportunity to look back to his oeuvre, following some distinct methods in literary theory. We will read Buzzati’s works underlining the continuity between his masterpiece, The Tartar Steppe, and an eventual, and controversial, novel, A Love Affair. Furthermore, we will read stories from his first collection, The Seven Messengers. Finally, we will observe an interesting case of intermedia conflation: the Poema a fumetti, a precocious example of graphic novel – this to further testify the importance and modernity of Buzzati in Italian literary history of the XXth Century.

Full programme

- - -


1. Ceserani, Guida breve allo studio della letteratura, Laterza
2. Buzzati, Il deserto dei Tartari, Oscar Mondadori
3. Buzzati, I sette messaggeri, Oscar Mondadori
4. Buzzati, Un amore, Oscar Mondadori
5. Buzzati, Poema a fumetti

Further readings will be available on the Elly webpage of the course

Teaching methods

Privileged methods will be the following: frontal lessons, film screening,g uided readings of selected narrative passages

Assessment methods and criteria

Oral exams, held in presence and/or, if necessary, via Teams. Questions will firstly regard the handbook, in order to subsequently involve themes, plot turns, the development of characters, as inferable from the reading of literary texts.Evaluation: A fail is determined by the lack of an understanding of the minimum content of the course, the inability to express oneself adequately, by a lack of autonomous preparation, the inability to solve problems related to information retrieval and the decoding of complex texts, as well as an inability to make independent judgments. A pass (18-23/30) is determined by the student’s possession of the minimum, fundamental contents of the course, an adequate level of autonomous preparation and ability to solve problems related to information retrieval and the decoding of complex texts, as well as an acceptable level of ability in making independent judgments. Middle-range scores (24-27/30) are assigned to the student who produces evidence of a more than sufficient level (24-25/30) or good level (26-27/30) in the evaluation indicators listed above. Higher scores (from 28/30 to 30/30 cum laude) are awarded on the basis of the student’s demonstration of a very good or excellent level in the evaluation indicators listed above.

Other information

- - -