PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
cod. 1000330

Academic year 2017/18
1° year of course - Second semester
Professor
Academic discipline
Logica e filosofia della scienza (M-FIL/02)
Field
Istituzioni di filosofia
Type of training activity
Characterising
30 hours
of face-to-face activities
6 credits
hub: PARMA
course unit
in ITALIAN

Learning objectives

1. Knowledge and comprehension of in¬de-pendent technical development in the Philo¬sophy of Science and the Mind
2. Understanding the interaction between philo¬sophical and scientific approaches both in traditional and contemporary re-search.
3. 4. 5. Improve abstract and conceptual clarity by encouraging class discussion.

Prerequisites

- - -

Course unit content

Are we and the universe we live in a virtual creation of a megaprogram running on a megacomputer? To answer this question, we riexamine some traditional philosophical problems: Monism vs Dualism, Scepticism vs Realism, Determinism vs Indeterminism, representations and minds. We'll start by looking at older versions of the same question (Descartes, Putnam) and proceed to see how mental and physical properties could be seen as computational in nature (Hofstadter, Sloman, Casti). The course ends with a straightforward discussion of the original question as it was developed by the Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom

Full programme

Discussion of Bostrom's simulation argument: how plausibile is it in the light of our present analysis of computational processes. First part: Skepticism. Second part: how to face problems like free will, conceptualization and emotions.

Bibliography

Students who cannot attend classes will negotiate a program with the teacher before the summer exam session.
The following texts will be sent to the other students:
Descartes, First and second meditation.
Puntam, Brains in the vat.
Kurzweil, intelligent machines.
Dennett, The evolution of free will.
Hofstadter, Fluid concepts.
Minsky, tehe emotion machine.
Bostrom, the simulation argument.

Teaching methods

Lectures

Assessment methods and criteria

Oral final exam. The student will be judged on the basis of his capacity to present good arguments concerning the topics discussed in class.

Other information

- - -